MEMPERTIMBANGKAN TEODISE LEIBNIZ

Authors

  • Ignasius Ngari

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61792/lim.v15i1,%20Oktober.16

Keywords:

teodise, kejahatan, mahakuasa, mahabaik, pencipta

Abstract

There are various ways of discussing theodicy. It can be characterized in three major traditions. They are the Plotinian theodicy, the Augustinian theodicy and the Irenean theodicy. Leibniz theodicy is a part of the Augustinian one. His argument concerning theodicy includes two main aspects. The first is the best of all possible worlds and the second is the argument of sufficient reason.  His argument goes like this.The core of Leibniz's solution is to argue that God does not underachieve in creating this world because this world is the best of all possible worlds. Leibniz was aware of the critics who reject that it is the best of all possible worlds.  He retains his argument in virtue of a central principle of his philosophical system, the Principle of Sufficient Reason. According to the Principle of Sufficient Reason, for any state of affairs, there must be a sufficient reason that explains why that state of affairs and not some other state of affairs obtains. When it comes to our world, then, there must be some reason that explains why it, and not some other world, obtains. By these two ideas, God and evil are two compatible things.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2019-06-27

Issue

Section

Articles